Blog

Mercury Prize 2009: nominees?




UPDATE: The Mercury nominees have been announced.  We predicted eight out of 12; that's not to say we agree with the list, just that much of it was maybe, just maybe, quite predictable.

Interestingly (for those interested in such things), they're split equally between major label and indie releases, with six apiece. The most nominated major, Columbia, scores a pair of nods with Kasabian and Glasvegas, while frontrunning indie XL sees The Horrors and Friendly Fires join the race for the prize, which will be awarded on 22nd September.

Click the links to read our reviews of the albums set to suddenly make quite a lot more money, which are:

FLORENCE AND THE MACHINE: Lungs

SPEECH DEBELLE: Speech Therapy

KASABIAN: West Ryder Pauper Lunatic Asylum

FRIENDLY FIRES: Friendly Fires

LA ROUX: La Roux

BAT FOR LASHES: Two Suns

THE HORRORS: Primary Colours

GLASVEGAS: Glasvegas

LED BIB: Sensible Shoes

SWEET BILLY PILGRIM: Twice Born Men

THE INVISIBLE: The Invisible

LISA HANNIGAN: Sea Sew

***

Today (21st July) sees the 2009 Mercury Prize nominees break cover. This curious award, given annually to an album released over the 12 months to July by an artist born in the UK or Ireland, is picked by mysterious judges with no recourse to public voting. Representation from online media on the panel remains sparse, too.

And yet the Mercury continues to excite more interest than just about any other music industry award in the UK. Some would suggest its likely picks have become a little obvious down the years since the first award, back in 1991; there are always token jazz, folk and underground dance albums, but the bulk of the nominees are likely to be drawn from commercial indie rock and pop releases. 

In 2008 Elbow proved popular winners, but there were such notable omissions from the nominees list that the credibility of the award was, in some quarters, called into question. How was it possible to ignore Portishead's stunning first album in a decade, for starters? 

Part of the fun with the Mercury, of course, is seeing whose noses are put out of joint by the nominations. Some will complain it's all too mainstream, others that it's tokenistic and still more will profess to struggle to see the point of it at all.

For sure, there is one overarching point to it, and it's the same as for any award – it boosts sales for its nominees. 2008 nominee Burial saw sales of his dubstep album Untrue rocket by more than 1000% between nomination and the ceremony.
So whose pockets will suddenly deepen today? 

Murmurings, chinstrokes and mumbles across the internets point to some obvious names, and some more perplexing possibilities.
Doves' Kingdom Of Rust and Manic Street Preachers' Journal For Plague Lovers are the established meat-and-two-veg indie rock standard bearers, with some suggesting a punt on Kasabian's West Ryder Pauper Lunatic Asylum too, but debutants Glasvegas are also widely expected to make an appearance.

Indie dance debuts must surely include the self titled efforts of Friendly Fires and Late Of The Pier, while of the flame-haired ladies, La Roux is the most mentioned, a mite ahead of Florence And The Machine.

I'd be shocked if at least one of The Bug, Speech Debelle or Micachu aren't in amongst it all somewhere. All are obvious Mercury-type acts and are certainly worthy picks. Outside nods for The Bookhouse Boys and multiple past nominee PJ Harvey, this time with John Parish, shouldn't be discounted either. Others I'd say are in with a shout are Bat For Lashes, Little Boots and (an outside bet, this) Fanfarlo. And who'll be holding the jazz fort this time?

Finally I'd also like to see The Horrors get a nod, if only for producer Geoff Barrow of Portishead to be recognised for his genius.

But there are only 12 spots for those nominees to fill. We'll post the list here when it's announced, and then the fun really begins to decide the worthiest winner. In the meantime, who would you nominate? Have I criminally missed off anyone?


No related posts found...

  • paul k

    damon’s monkey album…return of the prodigy…ray davies orchestral…nitin sawhney…and of course one to get the press interest levels up the ubiquitous lily allen.

  • Rob

    maccabees?

  • Dave

    Stuart Murdoch’s God Help the Girl shows more musical ambition than the rest of the contenders put together…

  • nat

    i hope maccabees get on there, they made an amazing second album.they deserve it

  • waz

    maccabees
    broken records could almost pass for the token folk position. if not emmy the great.
    and grammatics deserve a mention

  • Gideon Brody

    Camera Obscura. Totally unfashionable. Totally overlooked.
    Kasabian. A bunch of irritating twats. Nominated.

  • Michael

    ^^
    HA.
    Shame Micachu, The Bookhouse Boys and The Bug weren’t included, but hurrah for Sweet Billy Pilgrim and The Horrors in particular.
    An interview with one of the nominees will likely appear on these pages by the end of the week. OH THE THRILL.

  • Gideon Brody

    Friendly Fires is a very overrated record, too. The singles are fantastic, the rest is decidedly patchy.
    Good to see lots of nominations for the ladies in a lady-dominated music year… The Mercury show might sound like a woozy, drunken and disorganised affair, but at least it’ll be good to watch :D

  • John Murphy

    In the ‘criminally overlooked’ category, I’ll go for Blue Roses debut album. However, as that appears to have been ignored by the vast majority of the population, I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised.
    Bat For Lashes will win.
    The Horrors should win.
    Although The Invisible may well be worth a crafty punt. Cracking record, and very ‘Mercury-friendly’ if that makes sense.
    Is it just me who thinks that Elly from La Roux really can’t sing?
    And I’ll whisper it quietly as I know it’s none too fashionable in these here parts and the cool police will no doubt put out a warrant for my arrest, but…..*quiet voice* I really like Kasabian’s album.

  • Michael

    OH JOHN.
    Just for once I’d like one of the “token” acts to win, rather than one of the über-predictable ones. Sweet Billy Pilgrim, please.
    And if Kasabian win I might just foam at the mouth and go “ACK” a lot, like those unfortunates in 28 Days Later.

  • Gideon Brody

    Oh god, Kasabian won’t win will they?
    I feel a twinge of sickness.

  • Michael

    One of these days we should do our own awards.
    People can pay £100 to be considered by the panel of judges (a bargain, compared to what the Mercury charges), a credit card can give us carte blanche to throw a big party and only invite people we know in return for title sponsorship, and we can sit some token hacks in a gallery to write about it all – they can be fed limitless haribos for their trouble. And Micachu would be nominated.
    Who’s in?

  • http://www.musicomh.com Ben Hogwood

    One of the good things about the Mercury is the debate it always kicks off… and I’ll say I’m pleased about the Invisible in particular, it’s a grower of an album. Its connections with Matthew Herbert might be the reason Micachu didn’t get nominated, which is a shame. Would have been good to see James Yuill in there as well.
    However… I’ll risk some ire and side with John on Kasabian! Bat For Lashes has surprised me as a grower as well, while I’m still struggling with La Roux and Florence I’m afraid…
    I think Sweet Billy Pilgrim might win though. Would be a good result. More importantly perhaps, who would take our prize?

  • Gideon

    Must say, very surprised by White Lies omission. Surely better than Kasabian/Glasvegas?

  • Louise Edwards

    I like Lisa Hannigan’s sea sew; chilled and good.Reminds me a bit of another new artist Ruby Paul(Forbidden Fruit) would have been another choice of mine.
    Louise 4 girls